<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rand v Whalen: Focus on Engines or Users?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://managinggreatness.com/2009/10/08/rand-v-whalen-focus-on-engines-or-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://managinggreatness.com/2009/10/08/rand-v-whalen-focus-on-engines-or-users/</link>
	<description>Community, Content &#38; SEO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 06:32:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2009 Top SEO Smackdowns: Rand v. Whalen &#124; Managing Greatness</title>
		<link>http://managinggreatness.com/2009/10/08/rand-v-whalen-focus-on-engines-or-users/comment-page-1/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>2009 Top SEO Smackdowns: Rand v. Whalen &#124; Managing Greatness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managinggreatness.com/?p=379#comment-375</guid>
		<description>[...] For more on this issue, including a case study from Answers.com, see Rand v Whalen: Focus on Engines or Users? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For more on this issue, including a case study from Answers.com, see Rand v Whalen: Focus on Engines or Users? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

