This Week in Content Farms
What a week for content farms!
- On Friday Matt Cutts acknowledged some influential bloggers’ criticisms that Google had a faustian deal with Content Farms that were making Google worse. IMO Matt’s statement boiled down to:
- You’re wrong, Google is getting better, not worse, and we keep trying to keep up with “users’ skyrocketing expectations”
- You’re wrong, these sites aren’t spam
- You’re wrong, Google doesn’t give better rankings to sites that run AdSense
- We hear you though, and now that we’ve made so much progress on spam we’ll turn more attention to “content farms” which we define as “sites with shallow or low-quality content.” Google made two big changes in 2010 to combat these sites.
- A slew of bloggers and journalists came out with posts covering Matt’s post. Most celebrated that Google was finally going to knock out sites like eHow (which BTW, apparently gained traffic during the 2 changes Matt talked about), and that this would cripple the Demand Media IPO. Here are 2 more insightful posts (IMO) on the issue: Michael Martinez’s What is a content farm? and Aaron Wall’s Google gears up for relevancy changes.
- Demand Media had their IPO, which was even more wildly successful than most expected. It ended its first day with a market cap of $1.9 billion.
- Mahalo did a second pivot from their “human powered search” model. They didn’t even acknowledge their previous ridiculous claims of Mahalo 2.0’s overwhelming success (not). They announced that they’re doubling their staff this year and will be creating 2,500 videos per week in a model that seems copied directly from eHow.
- Stack Overflow gave their 2010 year in review. More on that on Monday. Short answer is that they’re doing a great job creating content for programmers and other computer enthusiasts and professionals. They’re not successful yet moving beyond that, but they may not have to be.
Nobody calls Stack Overflow a content farm but I include them here to try to define what a content farm is and isn’t.
The term “content farm,” like the term SEO, is often used by its critics to refer to every spammy tactic that they don’t like, or that cause other sites to rank above theirs.
Stack Overflow and eHow both meet the following criteria often used to identify content farms:
- Creates thousands of new pages every day
- Gets the vast majority of its traffic from Google. You might even say they view Google’s results page as their site’s home page (Stack Overflow co-founder Joel Spolsky in fact did say this).
- Content-creation mechanism naturally creates pages where demand has been identified.
The term “content farm” was coined to refer to the systematic and efficient creation of thousands of in-demand pages every day. eHow does that. So does Stack Overflow.
Matt Cutts just defined content farms as “sites with shallow or low-quality content.” By that definition, I don’t think they’re going to punish eHow. Neither does the stock market.
Tweets that mention This Week in Content Farms -- Topsy.com
January 27, 2011 @ 10:47 am
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Gil Reich, Gil Reich. Gil Reich said: This Week in Content Farms http://bit.ly/gh2TSd What a week it's been. […]
January 28, 2011 @ 11:40 am
I’d have to agree that it’s going to be a while before the success of content farms begin to contract. As you allude to in your post, before any action is taken by Google, they’re going to have to figure out a meaningful way of differentiating between the quality of content.
January 30, 2011 @ 11:05 am
Agreed. Google’s made a lot of progress. In this area looks like the next leap may have to come from better evaluating page-level quality.
January 28, 2011 @ 3:16 pm
I imagine google is just talking about 2 bit low-authority farms with scraped content, I doubt the big boys have anything to worry about. Although I would imagine, just like the whole “don´t buy paid links” thing, it is mainly just a scare tactic to stop all the jump-on-the-bandwagon wp-omatic scraper boys.
January 30, 2011 @ 11:03 am
Interesting comparison. You may be right.
January 28, 2011 @ 3:20 pm
I also have a tough time defining what a content farm is. There are sometimes when I read an eHow article and it does help me in what I needed to do but other times when the quality is terrible. There are also times when I find find terrible how-to’s on blogs that specialize in that niche. It seems like a tough thing to do as far as labeling who is and who isn’t a content farm but Google does need to do something about duplicate content and many low quality answers websites that simply have the question but no answer associated with it.
January 30, 2011 @ 11:02 am
Agreed. And I see Google just did make a change against duplicate content so we’ll see if that changes anything.
January 31, 2011 @ 3:06 am
Just a suggestion for you
I found your articles’ quality are good,I suggest you to submit links of your article to our website http://www.webmasterclip.com which is a social bookmarking website for webmasters ,web designers,web developers. You will get more traffic and backlinks.Submitting a link to WebmasterClip is as easy as Digg,just need 0.5-1 minutes.
February 3, 2011 @ 12:34 am
eHow articles may not all be quality but usually i get a rough answer to my question. They usually are NOT anywhere near unique and a more quality answer can be gleaned elsewhere with some quick searching. I don’t exactly know if they should be punished for producing low quality content, but they should not be at the top of results. But then again its extremely hard to prove consistently one answer is more “quality” than another one.